Middle of May

I meant weekly, not weakly

“Where does the time go?” “When does the space be?”

A recap of my bold promise at the end of 2018. I said I planned to:

  • Learn Latin
  • Study Peter Lombard’s Sentences (Got the complete set from my wife for Christmas)
  • Write every day on my story, Moloch Rising
  • Write at least weekly in this Blog
  • Restart the podcast My Stogie Mystagogy
  • Last, but not least: Make sure The Puppycat knows she is loved

So, I am learning Latin, having achieved a perfect score on the introductory level National Latin Exam for this past March.

I failed to continue to study Peter Lombard’s Sentences in favor of studying Latin.

I am writing sort of regularly on Moloch Rising although hardly daily. I am up to 20,000 words.

I fear that My Stogie Mystagogy shall not rise from the ashes – lack of time and lack of interest.

I hope and pray The Puppycat knows she is loved.

Posted in Musings | 1 Comment

End of 2018

Howdy, and Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

It’s been a busy 2017 and 2018 and here is to hoping 2019 is a bit more relaxed. New Year’s Goals:

  • Learn Latin (already started through Senior Learn)
  • Study Peter Lombard’s Sentences (Got the complete set from my wife for Christmas)
  • Write every day on my story, Moloch Rising
  • Write at least weekly in this Blog
  • Restart the podcast My Stogie Mystagogy
  • Last, but not least: Make sure The Puppycat knows she is loved

So, again, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Posted in Musings | Tagged , | 3 Comments

My Stogie Mystagogy – Episode 47

The State of Social Discourse

Posted in Philosophy | Comments Off on My Stogie Mystagogy – Episode 47

First Podcast of 2018!


So, here it is March, and just now getting to the first podcast of the new year.

This week’s topic: Everyday Carry and Prayer (and cigars and stuff)

Click to go to podcast

Posted in Podcast, Prayer | Comments Off on First Podcast of 2018!

Final Podcast of 2017

And looking forward to 2018

In this podcast we discuss cigars, Christmas family traditions, and the Incarnation.


Posted in Podcast | Comments Off on Final Podcast of 2017

The Supreme Dominion of God

Error in Prayer

In a previous post regarding prayer, I commented on the proper disposition to prayer.

However, what triggered that post  was a woman’s concern over obtaining verification that her prayers were heard. So now I would like to address this proof we want that our prayers will be answered.

The woman had mentioned a book she read. She felt the book implied that if she was “praying right” she would receive proof her prayers had been heard. If in fact the book implied that, it is wrong.

If we think the success of our prayer is dependent upon our efforts, that is not faith.

At its root, prayer is surrender to God’s supreme dominion.

Posted in Faith, Musings, Philosophy, Prayer | Tagged , , | 2 Comments


But, What If I Really Am Doing What I Don’t Want To Do?

BY: Frater Bovious

(CARROLLTON, TX – Cradle of Civilization) I need to make clear that the two previous columns specifically did not address addiction.

With regard to addiction, I am very specifically qualifying my statement that we sin because we want to as follows:

  • Sin requires a deliberate act of will by a knowing subject; addiction compromises brain function and thus culpability for actions. I am narrowing this comment to the topic of sin, not the topics of crime and punishment.
  • Because of the significant interference addiction causes to normal brain chemistry, there is a qualitative difference between addiction, habit, and virtue.

Yet, the will is still involved, even in addiction.

From the Catholic News Agency, I found the following quote in this article on addiction:

“He said basically we have this desire, and our desires are insatiable. So God made us with this desire for more more more, and with that desire we can do one of three things…we can become a stoic, an addict or a mystic.” – Dr. Bottaro quoting from a talk by Christopher West

A stoic, an addict, or a mystic. Intriguing. I see these as three dispositions toward reality.

I will add this simple observation, and then explore a bit what it may mean. People do recover from addiction. People quit smoking, they quit heroin, they quit drinking. They even quit meth. I think these are among the most addictive substances on the planet. And people do quit.

How? Why?

Plato likened the intellect to the charioteer guiding a team of horses. These horses are dark and light, and represent the mortal and immortal realities of man. (NB – not, as one might think, the good and bad realities of man. The mortal and immortal realities of man are both goods.) It is the job of the intellect to unite these two realities into an harmonious whole.

If the intellect fails in this task, then one response to reality is addiction.

In my case, preventive education helped to keep me away from illegal drugs. I was, simply, too afraid to try illegal drugs. And that seems to have been a rational fear, and has saved me from a lot of grief. And so a common prescript for avoiding sin applies to addictive substances – avoid the near occasion of addiction.

Avoiding the near occasion of addiction is incredibly critical as one exposure can trigger a brain chemistry response that overwhelms the intellect, leaving the will to choose, again and again, the apparent good of the next high.

So, how do people quit?

I read this article in Psychology Today. The article had a sub-heading: “The antidote to addiction is learning to tolerate reality.”

I was surprised and encouraged by this statement in the article:

For, as AA has long rightly recognized thanks to psychiatrist Carl Jung’s influence on its founder, alcoholism and other addictions are at least as much sicknesses of the soul, psyche or spirit as of the physical body and brain.

The author was, in part, speaking against the current positioning of addiction as a disease, as opposed to a disorder (both of which are sicknesses.) The problem of styling addiction as a disease is that a disease is something that happens to us, something for which it is difficult to blame ourselves. Whose fault is it when we get the mumps? Calling addiction a disease implies that it is not our fault. It puts the cause, and therefore the cure, outside of us. And therefore the culpability is outside us.

Yet, even when we are sick with a physical ailment, something that happened to us, we still have the ability to make a choice, and that choice is to say “yes” to treatment. And so, if styling addiction as a disease allows someone to seek treatment who otherwise would not, there is some value to that paradigm.

But the author of the article feels that the efforts to effect a “cure” are hampered by the fact the underlying issues responsible for the behavior that lead to addiction may not be addressed. While it is true the physical addiction must be addressed, if the underlying mental issues are not addressed, the cycle will begin again.

The author’s summary paragraph states that:

“The antidote to addiction is learning to tolerate reality. Little by little. That is what sobriety really is. This is what the recovering addict needs the most assistance with: soberly dealing with inner and outer reality. And part of existential reality involves personal responsibility.”

Later in this paragraph is this interesting statement, “What the addict needs to discover is that reality is bigger than we are.”

Yes, indeed.

However, tolerating reality would seem to be the Stoic response. I would suggest a slight modification to the subtitle of the article: “The antidote to addiction is falling in love with reality.” How does one do that? By falling in love with Truth.

I suggest the proper response to reality is to become a mystic. And that is an act of will. The proper response to our desire for our good.

Posted in Philosophy, Reality, Reason, Truth | 1 Comment